Digital Logos Edition
How do we react to the claim that physics must now be regarded as one of the liberal arts, for in its description of the universe it sets the stage for the drama of human life? If modern science has now become the dominant culture, how does Christianity look within it? What difference does the Christian idea of the contingence of nature make to science today? What difference does it make for Christian thought and culture to move away from the old idea of the world as a closed mechanical system of cause and effect into the new idea of the world as an open dynamic system configured by the behavior of light, the fastest messenger in the universe? These are some of the questions discussed in the light of James Clerk Maxwell’s discoveries of the mathematical properties of light, and of Albert Einstein’s generalization of the new understanding of light for a radically new and exciting view of nature that has made space travel possible and enabled us to trace the expansion of the universe back to conditions near its beginning. This is not a defensive book about science and religion in the usual vein. It is concerned rather with the deep mutual relation and respect of Christian and scientific thought for each other, and shows how this relationship throws new light upon basic Christian doctrines. This volume also warns against the dangers of a reactionary retreat from the rigors of scientific thought into fuzzy mythological interpretations of the incarnation, and calls for a deeper appreciation of the Nicene Creed upon which all Christendom rests.
“Einstein called for an indissoluble integration of geometry and experience at all levels of scientific investigation and theoretical formulation. Geometry must be brought into the midst of physical knowledge of the empirical world of space and time where it would be four-dimensional. This integration of the geometrical and the physical or of the theoretical and empirical entailed a unity of form and being or of structure and matter, which had far-reaching implications for fundamental knowledge in every sphere of human inquiry. Expressed more generally, it involved the unification of epistemology and ontology in rigorous fidelity to the fact that theoretical and empirical factors are found already inhering in one another in objective reality.” (Pages 24–25)
“It is important to realise that the constancy of the speed of light in all systems is not a derivative but an ultimate principle with an independence of its own. While all entities and events in the universe are defined relationally in terms of space and time, and space and time are defined relationally in terms of light, light is not defined by reference to any contingent reality beyond itself. In other words, ‘light has a unique metaphysical status in the universe’. That was the point discovered by Einstein when he established that the speed of light remains the same irrespective of any motion in its source or of any motion on the part of the observer.” (Page 78)
“There are, then, distinctive forms of rational order in the universe which require for their understanding and articulation distinctive ways of thought and expression, but far from conflicting with one another they involve and combine with one another in the one rational order of the universe. The basic forms of rational order demanding recognition are the numerical, the verbal, the organic and the aesthetic.” (Page 32)