Digital Logos Edition
For over twenty years, Craig Blomberg’s The Historical Reliability of the Gospels has provided a useful antidote to many of the toxic effects of skeptical criticism of the Gospels. Offering a calm, balanced overview of the history of Gospel criticism, especially that of the late twentieth century, Blomberg introduces readers to the methods employed by New Testament scholars and shows both the values and limits of those methods. He then delves more deeply into the question of miracles, Synoptic discrepancies and the differences between the Synoptics and John. After an assessment of noncanonical Jesus tradition, he addresses issues of historical method directly. This new edition has been thoroughly updated in light of new developments with numerous additions to the footnotes and two added appendixes. Readers will find that over the past twenty years, the case for the historical trustworthiness of the Gospels has grown vastly stronger.
“What is presupposed, however, is that whoever wrote Matthew and Luke had access to early traditions about Jesus in addition to Mark and Q.” (Pages 45–46)
“the question of what belongs in the canon of Scripture is purely a historical, and not an ecclesiastical, one” (Page 31)
“Matthew has Jesus enjoin his followers to be ‘perfect’ as their heavenly Father is, while the Lucan parallel employs the word ‘merciful’ (Matt. 5:48; Luke 6:36). It is possible that the Aramaic word Jesus could have used (šělim) implied both concepts in its original context.” (Page 160)
“Baur’s views have been largely rejected by twentieth-century scholarship,28 but his general principle that contradictory theologies best account for the divergences of the Gospels is a regular presupposition of current research.” (Page 33)
“because by definition much if not all of Q has been preserved—embedded in the finished forms of Matthew and Luke” (Page 40)
5 ratings
Chetan Paul
9/1/2024
Jim Anderson
8/16/2024
Craig Bullock
6/30/2024
Samuel Sefa-Yeboah
6/9/2024
김호준
6/7/2024