Digital Logos Edition
Robert D. Holmstedt’s commentary on Ruth emphasizes the importance of understanding old and new grammatical and linguistic elements in the Hebrew text. He cites the latest scholarship throughout this study and addresses difficult topics surrounding the interpretation of the book of Ruth.
“It is also possible, though, that it presents a summary of the family’s time in Moab since their initial immigration” (Page 64)
“For Ruth, the data thus suggest that the book sits on the relative dating cline between books like Gen-Deut, Josh-Kings on the one side and Ezra-Neh, Chronicles, and Qohelet on the other.” (Page 31)
“Verbal modifiers fit into two main categories: complements and adjuncts. Complements are obligatory constituents modifying the verb in a clause; if such constituents were omitted, the clause would be incomplete.” (Pages 4–5)
“‘Two-place predicates’ (e.g., transitive verbs), in contrast, take two arguments, an external one (a subject) and an internal one (e.g., objects, adverbs, prepositional phrases).” (Page 7)
“In contrast to complements, adjuncts are optional constituents modifying the verb in a clause; such constituents may be omitted without affecting the basic grammaticality of the clause.” (Page 6)