Digital Logos Edition
Evangelicals lead churches, plant churches, fill churches, and even split churches. But they have not distinguished themselves in theological reflection on the church. This book tackles what the character of evangelicalism as a loose coalition of Christians says about the movement’s attitude toward the church. Are certain ecclesiologies more in keeping with the evangelical ethos than others? What is the parachurch’s role in shaping evangelical church structure?
Contributors from several disciplines and denominations, including Howard Snyder, George Hunsberger, and Roger E. Olson, examine the state of the evangelical church in Evangelical Ecclesiology. This volume brings together fresh reflections—and provocations—on the subject of the church.
Essential for students, scholars, pastors, and laypeople, this informative volume brings fresh perspectives on theological matters. With the Logos Bible Software edition, searching by topic or Scripture references will further help your understanding—you’ll compare, for example, the systematic theologies of various scholars or denominations.
“‘Though you are not of the church of England, yet if you are persuaded in your own minds of the truth of the way wherein you now walk, I leave it. However, whether Conformists, or Nonconformists, our main concern should be, to be assured that we are called and taught of GOD, for none but such are fit to minister in holy things.’36 Thus, neither Anglican nor Congregationalist church order was understood as being the essence of the church or its ministry. The essence of the church lay rather in what we might call the convocation of the Spirit, the awareness that ‘we are called and taught of God.’ In this sense, Whitefield viewed the church as essentially pneumatic.” (Page 32)
“This raises serious questions when we think about the theology of the church today. Did evangelicalism represent a separation of religion from traditional ecclesiastical life? Is there a theology of the church that can explain this enduring phenomenon? Is it still possible to say with Cyprian that ‘he cannot have God for his Father who has not the church for his mother’” (Page 23)
“Early modern evangelicalism displayed an unprecedented transdenominational and international ecclesial consciousness that was characterized by an unparalleled subordination of church order to evangelical piety.” (Page 15)
“The ecclesial authority of political rulers in church and state had been decisively rejected or subordinated to other spiritual ideals, but authority could not be rejected forever.” (Page 36)
“How do we account for true believers in other communions, those in whom we recognize the regenerate life of the Spirit of God?” (Page 19)
Like most things ‘evangelical,’ evangelical ecclesiology is up for grabs today. Even evangelical theologians, in their attempts to discern what the church is called to be, find themselves looking in a plethora of directions for constructive models, from the free church tradition to Eastern Orthodoxy and the Celtic church. The essays in Evangelical Ecclesiology display not only the tensions within contemporary evangelical thought about the variety of ways in which evangelical thinkers seek to assist the people of God in the task of being the church in the contemporary world but also the vitality of the current discussion.
—Stanley J. Grenz (1950–2005), Pioneer McDonald Professor of Theology, Carey Theological College
I heartily recommend this anthology, not because it will answer any of the questions it poses, but because I put it down with them more sharply focused than before. It belongs on the bookshelves of all, clergy and laity, academic and professional, interested in the continuing development of evangelical identity in North America.
—Canadian Evangelical Review
The book is a welcome introduction into the much-needed discussion concerning evangelical ecclesiology. It is easy to read and has a wealth of footnotes for anyone desiring more in depth study.
—Criswell Theological Review
These essays represent a wide variety of thought-provoking views. One of the strengths of the book is the vigor with which different views are presented and the fact that no attempt is made to reconcile differences or break them down into a common view. . . . This is not a progressively coordinated study like a text with a single author. Its value is perceived to lie in precisely the opposite character—in the diversity of views robustly presented. Several of the chapters could be used to stimulate new patterns of thought in courses on church and mission. The essays in this book make important and serious contributions to thought regarding the evangelical ethos, and its sense of both the church and its mission.
—Missiology
A very interesting book. . . . The book offers valuable insights for theologians and church practitioners. It can be useful to pastors searching for clues to the contemporary maze of ecclesiologies in congregations that choose to leave out the denominational adjective in their names. It will also be useful to students in seminary classes.
—Review and Expositor