Digital Logos Edition
This classroom favorite by respected New Testament scholar Gary Burge is a practical resource for students and scholars. The expanded second edition, revised to take account of current scholarship, introduces software tools that have become available since the original edition was published. Combining original insight with how-to guidance, this introduction to the Gospel of John helps students interpret the text and apply it in teaching and preaching.
The Logos edition of Interpreting the Gospel of John: A Practical Guide integrates seamlessly into your digital library. Quickly search your entire library by topic or Scripture verse with the click of a button. Quick and easy access to maps and charts, as well as definitions and lexical information, allow you to understand historical events in the Bible like never before. Automatic syncing between devices prevents you from spending time searching for where you left off.
Want more tools to help you study the New Testament? Check out the rest of the seven-volume Guides to New Testament Exegesis Collection!
You can save when you purchase this product as part of a collection.
“John is filled, Abrahams contended, with subtle allusions to the Old Testament and Jewish tradition. In John 2:6, for example, John refers to ‘stone’ water pots for Jesus’s Cana miracle. Only a Jew who understood ritual purity would appreciate such a detail.” (Pages 11–12)
“Clearly, the text of John is made up of sources pieced together to form a unified narrative. If we look carefully, we can discern seams where these sources have been stitched together. Some of them are rough, rugged signs of an awkward assembly. But that is fine. It shows us that John, no less than the Synoptics, is made up of ancient sources that predate the author’s own efforts.” (Page 83)
“Rather, John has artfully crafted a Gospel, and it bears all the marks of a unique and careful design.” (Page 98)
“The second area of development has to do with historical location” (Page 23)
“But a new, infinitely more beneficial type of commentary seeks the theological message within the canonical form of the text. Scholars such as Brown (1966–70), Morris (1971), Barrett (1978), Beasley-Murray (1987), Carson (1991), Witherington (1995), Burge (2000), Keener (2003), Köstenberger (2004), and von Wahlde (2010), among others, know the older tradition but choose for theological reasons to make sense of the Gospel as we have it—to explore its own coherence (instead of hidden strata) and to examine its final message (instead of traces of its development).” (Page 76)
1 rating