Digital Logos Edition
At first glance, it may seem strange that after more than 2,000 years of biblical interpretation there are still major disagreements among biblical scholars about what the Jewish and Christian Scriptures say, and about how one is to read and understand them. Yet the range of interpretive approaches now available is the result both of the richness of the biblical texts themselves and of differences in the worldviews of the communities and individuals who have sought to make the Scriptures relevant to their own time and place. A History of Biblical Interpretation provides detailed and extensive studies of the interpretation of the Scriptures by Jewish and Christian writers throughout the ages.
“Thus, he provides an example of the early Christian tendency to see events in the New Testament mysteriously prefigured in the Old when he states that the scarlet thread hung from Rahab’s house prefigures the blood of Christ (12.7).” (Pages 308–309)
“The major added feature in early Christian interpretation was the presupposition that Jesus was the Christ, and this reconfigured the intertextual connections of Jewish tradition and created new ones, often through typological interpretation.” (Page 40)
“Thus, Philo frequently interprets the same text on two or three different levels” (Page 16)
“A key concept for Philo is the transcendence of God” (Page 16)
“The two powers ‘God’ (theos) and ‘Lord’ (kyrios) bridge the gap between God’s simultaneous transcendence and immanence. Philo’s ‘eclecticism consists in being a Platonist about transcendence, and a Stoic about immanence’ (Siegert 1996, 170).” (Page 119)
1 rating
Glenn Crouch
6/5/2018