Digital Logos Edition
This collection of essays seeks to establish the properly oriented use of the historical-critical method to interpret the Word of God in the Church. Joseph A. Fitzmyer presents the volume in defense of this method for the benefit of all Christian churches.
“The result was that many Catholics at that time lived abiblical or nonbiblical lives” (Page 3)
“We would love to know what in it was ‘offensive to pious ears’ or ‘close to heresy.’ Another censured proposition was: ‘The holy obscurity of the Word of God is not a reason for the laity to dispense themselves from the reading of it’ (§81).3 That was Quesnel’s moral reflection on Acts 8:31, which records the Ethiopian’s question, ‘How can I (understand Isaiah), unless someone guides me?’” (Page 2)
“Scripture plays a role in the life of the Church, by being, along with Tradition, the supreme rule of faith, because in it our heavenly Father speaks to and meets his children; for this reason easy access to Scripture should be available to the Christian faithful in accurate vernacular translations.” (Page 7)
“The preconciliar Catholic Church in the twentieth century was a deeply eucharistic Church, in which most of the faithful had no idea of what the ‘Word of God’ was all about.” (Page 2)
“Part of the unfortunate heritage of the Counter Reformation has been that Catholics tended to shy away from the Bible, as if it were ‘the Protestant book.” (Page 1)