Digital Logos Edition
In the final nine chapters of the Gospel of Mark, Jesus increasingly struggles with his disciples’ incomprehension of his unique concept of suffering messiahship and with the opposition of the religious leaders of his day. The Gospel recounts the events that led to Jesus’ arrest, trial, and crucifixion by the Roman authorities, concluding with an enigmatic ending in which Jesus’ resurrection is announced but not displayed.
In this volume, New Testament scholar Joel Marcus offers a new translation of Mark 8–16. He situates the narrative within the context of first-century Palestine and the larger Greco-Roman world; within the political context of the Jewish revolt against the Romans (66–73 C.E.); and within the religious context of the early church’s sometimes rancorous engagement with Judaism, pagan religion, and its own internal problems. For religious scholars, pastors, and interested lay people alike, the book provides an accessible and enlightening window on the second of the canonical Gospels.
“(3) as a command to Peter to resume the path of discipleship rather than trying to lead Jesus.” (Page 607)
“Again, however, the Markan Jesus does not just insist that his addressees show their love for God through their love for their neighbors; he will also demonstrate and make such love possible by giving his life ‘as a ransom for many’ (10:45; cf. 14:24).” (Page 843)
“But this is the paradox of Markan theology: Jesus will ultimately be vindicated by God, and his enemies will see him triumph (cf. 14:62), but this triumphal procession must pass through the way of the cross.” (Page 1013)
“Then, people disobeyed the command to silence and told the news (1:44–45; 7:36); now, when the time for secrecy is over (cf. 9:9), the angel calls for open proclamation—but the women run away and tell their news to no one (cf. Lincoln, ‘Promise,’ 290–91). Apparently, ‘the mystery of the dominion of God’ (cf. 4:11–12), according to which the new age has arrived without obliterating all traces of old-age fear, misunderstanding, and opposition to the divine will, continues after the resurrection, and this paradox affects not only the outside world but also the followers of Jesus (cf. Marcus, ‘Epistemology,’ 574).” (Page 1087)
“If the Temple was to be destroyed, this destruction was usually expected to be the work of God (see, e.g., 2 Chron 36:17–21; Jeremiah 26; Ezek 9:7–8; 10:18–19; 11:22–23; 1 En. 90.28). Similarly, in Jesus’ own forecast of Temple destruction (Mark 13:2), the crucial verb ‘be thrown down’ (katalythȩ̄) is a divine passive (see the GLOSSARY and the COMMENT on 13:1–2). But Dan 9:26–27 Theod. contains the cryptic prophecy that an ‘anointed one’ (chrisma) will destroy ‘the city and the sanctuary,’ apparently before being destroyed himself (cf. Pitre, Jesus, 374 n. 364).” (Page 1003)
15 ratings
andreas febryanto
9/19/2024
Lance Roberts
5/7/2024
Jim Rudolph
5/13/2019
Benny Amaya
1/18/2019
Chan Yew Ming
10/8/2016
Pastor Kay
6/27/2016
Stefan Zsupos
4/13/2016
Unix
1/12/2016
James
5/30/2015
MDD
4/2/2015