Digital Logos Edition
The thesis that the books of Deuteronomy to 2 Kings have undergone a redaction that made them into a Deuteronomistic History has become a widely accepted idea in Old Testament scholarship since Martin Noth proposed it in 1943. But there is no consensus when this history was edited: under Josiah (622 BCE), during the exile (c. 560 BCE) or even later? And what was the intention of its redactors? Can we rely on the so-called Deuteronomistic History for the reconstruction of Israelite history? Or should we give up the thesis of a Deuteronomic redaction of the Former Prophets?
This volume explores these and many other questions about this key topic in Old Testament scholarship. It results from a research seminar organized by the Swiss universities of Fribourg, Geneva, Neuchtel and Lausanne. It contains contributions by the following scholars: R. Albertz, J. Briend, M. Detienne, W. Dietrich, J. J. Glassner, S. Japhet, E. A. Knauf, A. D. H. Mayes, S. L. McKenzie, S. Pisano, M. Rose, A. Schenker, F. Smyth, A. de Pury and T. Romer. Articles in French were translated by J. Edward Crowley.
You can save when you purchase this product as part of a collection.
Albert de Pury is Professor of Old Testament Studies at the University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Thomas Römer is Professor of Old Testament Studies at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Daniel Macchi is Junior Lecturer in Old Testament at the University of Geneva, Switzerland.