Digital Logos Edition
“Luther is often greatly misunderstood on this point, with his soteriological doctrine of sola fide (faith alone) often being criticized by those who don’t properly comprehend its fine points, as somehow recommending that good works in the Christian life are worthless and thus, not to be urged. Nothing could be further from the truth.” (Page 231)
“It’s one of the plainest and most striking instances of the necessity of binding Church authority: so much so, that even Protestants accept this authority, whether they are aware of it or not (at least in the case of 66 out of the 73 biblical books). It can’t possibly be based on biblical authority, because the Bible never names its own books. Thus it can’t be a function of sola Scriptura, and there must be an exception made in this case. Authority lies solely with the Church, not the Bible Alone.” (Page 59)
“The ‘Reformation’ (as it is usually referred to) was indeed a ‘Revolution’ or ‘Revolt’ insofar as it departed from passed-down Christian Tradition. The early church did not resemble Protestantism all that much, yet Protestantism claimed to be restoring it, or hearkening back to that earlier ‘golden era’: the literal meaning of ‘Reformation’. One can’t re-form something that never existed in any form (as we Catholics would argue).” (Page 12)
“interior, organic process, Luther is beginning to take it as something exterior and mechanical” (Page 64)
“Luther’s revolutionary notion of bene operando peccamus is similar to John Calvin’s more developed doctrine of total depravity. Both are expressly unbiblical. The Bible (as I will seek to demonstrate below) teaches no such doctrine of ‘sin is present no matter what good works we do, if we don’t do them with absolutely perfect intentions and sanctity’. Nor does it teach that unregenerate men or those who haven’t heard the gospel can do no truly (intrinsically) good works whatsoever, nor that they cannot be saved. This needs to be dealt with at some length also, because it is such a crucial plank of Luther’s, Calvin’s and historic Calvinism’s soteriology.” (Page 69)
You can save when you purchase this product as part of a collection.