Digital Logos Edition
Both theology and philosophy wrestle with the tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility. In Christianity, this tension is particularly acute because God is both omnipotent and benevolent.
This tension underlies numerous other questions about the nature of God, the meaning of free will and choice, the concept of divine repentance, the reign of God, and perhaps most of all, the significance of the incarnation.
Renowned scholar D.A. Carson brings clear insights and finely-honed exegetical skills to this important issue. In his treatment, the tension between divine sovereignty and human responsibility is not so much as a problem to be solved as a framework to be explored.
For more by D.A. Carson, see Wipf & Stock D.A. Carson Collection (5 vols.).
“Yahweh himself is to be credited with sanctifying the people. Clearly, that Yahweh is the sanctifier does not relieve the Israelites of their responsibility to sanctify themselves; and conversely, that responsibility does not entail Yahweh’s passivity in their sanctification.” (Pages 10–11)
“God does not stand behind evil action in precisely the same way that he stands behind good action.” (Page 36)
“Once again, then, the divine activity calls for response, not fatalism; while human calling and seeking do not make the divine activity contingent.” (Page 14)
“The sovereignty-responsibility tension is almost impossibly broad. It lies at the heart of questions about the nature of God, and it poses difficult conundra about the meaning of human ‘freedom’. The most common questions it raises are well known. If God is absolutely sovereign, in what sense can we meaningfully speak of human choice, of human will? In what way are we to relate passages which stress divine transcendence and omnipotence with those which speak of divine repentance? How does the shape of the sovereignty-responsibility tension affect the problem of theodicy? Must God be reduced to accommodate the freedom of human choice? Does significant human responsibility so lean on power to the contrary that God becomes contingent?” (Page 1)
“But the point to note is the manner in which divine sovereignty and human responsibility are here interrelated. Contrary to views which see divine sovereignty and human responsibility as mutually limiting, the former does not in fact alleviate the latter, while the latter in no way curtails the former.” (Page 11)
4 ratings
Paul James
4/19/2019
Doug Olson
11/28/2018
Faithlife User
11/18/2018
Jason Guenther
4/18/2018