Digital Logos Edition
The Universe as Communion presents a new and distinctive approach to the science-religion debate. Developing ideas from the Church Fathers, Alexei Nesteruk treats faith—with its sense of the divine presence—and knowledge of the universe as two modes of communion which constitute the human condition. The modern opposition between science and theology is treated as the split between two intentionalities of the overall human subjectivity. The human “person,” as a center of their reconciliation, becomes the major theme of the dialogue between science and theology. Nesteruk argues that the reconciliation of science and theology is not simply an academic exercise, but that it requires an existential change, a change of mind which can’t be affected without ecclesial involvement.
“Everything which Christ taught his disciples through parables was conceived by them through the action of the Spirit upon them at the Pentecost. Thus the entry of the Kingdom of God and annunciation about a new aeon in the event of Nativity was inaugurated by the same Spirit, who by his action initiated Logos’ entry into history. In a similar way the vision of the mystery of one’s birth being unfolded through the movement to the future, that is, in perspective of person’s becoming and potential salvation, is initiated by the Holy Spirit who activates in human subjectivity that eschatological intentionality which we have already called the spirit-like intentionality.” (Page 161)
“Thus, the ‘phenomenological turn’ in the problem of theology and science, as briefly outlined earlier, leads one to understand that the major and most difficult point in this dialogue is the dual position of humanity in the universe expressed as finite and local embodiment of humanity in cosmic stuff on the one hand, and its unlimited ability to transcend the locality of its body through knowledge across the universe, on the other. This is the problem of the origin of humanity, not in a trivial biological sense but as its own metaphysical origin, as incarnate hypostatic consciousness.” (Page 50)
“The state of affairs in modern science and technology reflects the situation in which man not only did not fulfil its function as the priest of creation, but making itself an ultimate point of reference, that is, God, through rational exploration and mathematization of nature, it condemned the universe to finitude and inevitable decay according to physical laws,59—the finitude and transience which originates in the finitude and transience of man itself, whose blindness to the transcendent shields it from understanding its createdness and contingency upon God.” (Page 198)
A valuable and interesting contribution of Alexei Nesteruk to the hotly debated topic of possibilities and ways of dialogue between science and religion.
—European Journal of Science and Theology
. . . exemplary book for graduate students with interests in Orthodoxy and the theology and science dialogue.
—Bradford McCall, Theological Book Review, vol. 21, no. 1
Altogether, this is a fascinating and ambitious undertaking.
—Ben Fulford, lecturer, systematic theology, University of Chester